PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 23, 2020Scientific Reports37 citationsOpen Access

Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers

VTVien T. TruongCPCassady PalmerMYMichael B. Young

Structured PICO

Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking (CMR-FT) provide comparable right atrial strain measurements to two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) in healthy volunteers?

P
Population
61 healthy volunteers, mean age 45 ± 13 years
I
Intervention
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking (CMR-FT)
C
Comparator
Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE)
O
Outcome
Right atrial (RA) strain (reservoir, conduit, and booster) and reproducibilitysurrogate

CMR-FT is a reproducible alternative to 2D-STE for assessing right atrial strain in healthy individuals.

Abstract

Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), and more recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking (CMR-FT) provides insight into all phases of atrial function. The aim of our study was to compare all phases of RA strain using CMR-FT and STE and also assess the relationship between RA and LA strain. A total of 61 healthy volunteers with mean age of 45 ± 13 years had adequate tracking for analysis on CMR-FT and 2D-STE. Females had larger RA reservoir strain (39 ± 15% vs. 32 ± 13%, p = 0.046) and conduit strain (26 ± 12% vs. 20 ± 9%, p = 0.03) when compared to males, but was not the case with booster strain (14 ± 7% vs. 12 ± 6%, p = 0.45). In comparison with STE derived strain, the RA reservoir and conduit strain were not significantly different between CMR-FT and the three echocardiography gating methods (p > 0.05 for all). Noticeably, there were no significant differences in strain and strain rate between RA and LA function using CMR-FT (p > 0.05 for all). RA strain and strain rate using CMR-FT had fair and good intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and had superior reproducibility compared to STE derived strain.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Truong et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a109a3a1406dce28afcc3d1https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62105-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper