Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We analyze the presence of substructures in a set of 48 galaxy clusters, by using galaxy positions and redshifts. The data are taken from literature sources, with the addition of some new data provided by recent observations of galaxy clusters. We use a multi-scale analysis which couples kinematical estimators with the wavelet transform. With respect to previous works, we introduce three new kinematical estimators. These estimators parameterize the departures of the local means and/or local dispersions of the measured radial velocities with respect to their global values for the environment. We classify the analyzed clusters as unimodal, bimodal and complex systems. We find that ∼ 14% of our clusters are strongly substructured (i.e. they are bimodal or complex) and that ∼ 24 % of the remaining unimodal clusters contain substructures at small scales. Thus, in substantial agreement with previous studies, about one third of clusters show substructures. We find that the presence of substructures in unimodal clusters does not affect the estimates of both velocity dispersions and virial masses. Moreover, the galaxy velocity dispersion is generally in good agreement with the X-ray temperature, according to the expectations of the standard isothermal model
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Girardi et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: