Why the study?
Existing echocardiography segmentation approaches either only segment end-systolic and end-diastolic frames without leveraging motion information, or only utilize motion information as an auxiliary task.
Does a novel motion-enhanced echocardiography segmentation method improve the accuracy of left ventricular ejection fraction estimation in patient echo sequences?
Does a novel motion-enhanced echocardiography segmentation method improve the accuracy of left ventricular ejection fraction estimation in patient echo sequences?
A novel motion-enhanced echocardiography segmentation method accurately estimates left ventricular ejection fraction, potentially improving automated echocardiographic analysis.
Should not yet change clinical EF assessment; leaves open prospective validation of automated echocardiography tools.
Quantification of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) from echocardiography depends upon the identification of endocardium boundaries as well as the calculation of end-diastolic (ED) and end-systolic (ES) LV volumes. It's critical to segment the LV cavity for precise calculation of EF from echocardiography. Most of the existing echocardiography segmentation approaches either only segment ES and ED frames without leveraging the motion information, or the motion information is only utilized as an auxiliary task. To address the above drawbacks, in this work, we propose a novel echocardiography segmentation method which can effectively utilize the underlying motion information by accurately predicting optical flow (OF) fields. First, we devised a feature extractor shared by the segmentation and the optical flow sub-tasks for efficient information exchange. Then, we proposed a new orientation congruency constraint for the OF estimation sub-task by promoting the congruency of optical flow orientation between successive frames. Finally, we design a motion-enhanced segmentation module for the final segmentation. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieved state-of-the-art performance for EF estimation, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.893 and a Mean Absolute Error of 5.20% when validated with echo sequences of 450 patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xue et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: