Both the Delphi method and nominal group technique structured, transparent and replicable ways of individual judgements and have been used for priority setting and guideline development health-related research including reproductive. Within evidence-based practice they provide a of collating expert opinion where little evidence∄.They are distinct from many other methods they incorporate both qualitative and quantitative. Both methods are inherently flexible; this also discusses other strengths and weaknesses of methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teijlingen et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: