Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We document several empirical regularities regarding the evolution of urban structure in the largest U.S. metropolitan areas over the period 1980–90. These regularities relate to changes in resident population, employment, occupations, as well as the number and size of establishments in different sections of the metropolitan area. We then propose a theory of urban structure that emphasizes the location and internal structure decisions of firms. In particular, firms can decide to locate their headquarters and operation plants in different regions of the city. Given that cities experienced positive population growth throughout the 1980s, we show that firm fragmentation produces the diverse set of facts documented in the article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rossi‐Hansberg et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: