Summary Recent discussion of the formation and alteration of P hilistine identity in the L evantine I ron A ge continues to reference primarily pottery styles and dietary practices. Such traditional narratives propose that the P hilistines comprised one group of the ‘Sea Peoples’ and that the cultural boundary markers that distinguished their society in the I ron A ge I (twelfth–eleventh century BC ) diminished in importance and disappeared suddenly in the early I ron A ge IIA (tenth century BC ), with the ascendancy of the Judahite kingdom. Based on data from the Levant (especially P hilistia), the A egean and Cyprus, we argue for a more complex understanding of the P hilistines who came to the region with an identity that drew on, and continued to engage with, a broad range of foreign artefact styles and cultural practices with non‐Levantine connections. Concurrently they incorporated local cultural attributes, at least until the late ninth century BC , a feature that we argue was unrelated to the supposed tenth century expansion of the Judahite kingdom.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maeir et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: