Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: (1) Update data on work participation among patients with SSc followed in a multidisciplinary setting at a Belgian reference centre; (2) Investigate associations between work outcomes, personal, disease-related and contextual factors. METHODS: One hundred and eight adult SSc patients, 84% fulfilling the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria for SSc, were questioned on their socio-economic status during outpatient visits at Ghent University Hospital (February 2020-March 2021). Employment rate was compared with the general population after adjustment for age and sex. Associations between two work-related outcomes and socio-demographic and clinical variables were explored through binary logistic regression (outcome 1: having a paid job) and negative binomial regression (outcome 2: sick leave). RESULTS: Among 81/108 (75%) participants of working age (18-65 y/o), crude employment rate was 64%, corresponding to a standardized employment ratio of 0.90 (95% CI 0.69-1.17). Work disability was the most common reason for not having a paid job (20%), with patients being older, less well educated and more functionally impaired compared with those with a paid job. Health-related sick leave in the previous year was substantial (79%); the number of days absent from work was significantly associated with internal organ involvement (incidence rate ratio, IRR, 0.3 [95% CI 0.1-0.8]) and working full-time (IRR 0.3 [95% CI 0.1-0.7]). CONCLUSION: Work participation in SSc patients is comparable to the general population, although work disability and sick leave remain substantial. Socio-demographic and job-related factors should be taken into account when assessing work outcomes in SSc, rather than basing work outcomes on disease characteristics alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Desimpele et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: