Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Child pornography is not necessarily thought of as an example of dangerous speech, but rather it is considered a type of child sexual abuse. However, whilst the law was initially based on the protection of children, it has gradually moved away from this concept and it now arguably covers material that is not harmful. This article will consider what constitutes child pornography under English law and assess where there is potential under and over-criminalisation. It suggests that there should be reform of the law to return it to focus on the protection of children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alisdair A. Gillespíe (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: