The Danish River Sus'a is at the studied reaches a third-fourth order low gradient stream with a large summer biomass of macrophytes. In a simple model daily mean water temperature was described as a function of daily mean air temperature at the two localities studied. A linear regression analysis showed that the slopes of the two regression lines were significantly different, which could be explained by the relative proportion of incoming groundwater. A simple model for estimating the diel variations in stream water temperature was established from submodels of incoming and outgoing radiation and of the exchange of heat, mainly with the atmosphere. The only input to the model is air temperature and photosynthetic active radiation, PAR. Two parameters, Aso, and Acon were calibrated. The parameter Aso, expresses the proportion of PAR used to heat the water. At the upstream locality Aso, varied with season due to shading from the herbaceous bank vegetation, whereas Asol at the downstream locality was constant. ACon expresses the rate of heat exchange between air and water, and Acon was found to be linearly related to the reaeration coefficient, which was estimated independently. The model simulated the diel variations in water temperatures quite accurately. Even on days when air temperature and PAR showed large fluctuations did simulated water temperatures deviate less than 1°C from actual measurements during 90% of the time. Using the model at the downstream reach, with an average Asoi and A¢on as estimated from the reaeration coefficient simulated temperatures did never deviate more than 2°C from actual measurements and less than 1°C in 84% of the time. It is concluded that the establishment of such simple temperature models would be very useful in a wide range of ecological studies in streams.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeppesen et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: