Previous research has highlighted the important role of officers' attitudes and receptivity to the change to community policing. We identified two levels of commitment—commitment to the police organization as a whole and commitment to the strategic direction of the police department toward community policing and found evidence that the two levels of commitment are distinct. Organizational commitment was directly related to job satisfaction but only indirectly related to officers' behaviors consistent with those expected with a community-policing orientation. Conversely, the level of commitment to a community-policing strategy was unrelated to job satisfaction but directly related to the frequency of community policing-type behaviors. Strategy commitment also mediated the effects of managerial support and organizational commitment and partially mediated the effects of job experience on officers' behavior. Implications of this multiple-level perspective to commitment for future research are discussed. This project was supported by Cooperative Agreement 97-ck-wx-0010 from the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions contained in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This project was supported by Cooperative Agreement 97-ck-wx-0010 from the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions contained in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Notes This project was supported by Cooperative Agreement 97-ck-wx-0010 from the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions contained in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ford et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: