Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A spatial stochastic approach was adopted to estimate the capture zones of a welifield in eastern Netherlands near the town of Wierden. The main sources of uncertainty were found to be the hydraulic conductivity of the production aquifer and the spatial distribution and thickness of an impeding clay layer situated above the production aquifer. Both were modeled as random space functions and a Monte Carlo analysis was performed to assess the probability distributions of the capture zones for t = 25 years and t →∞. The distributions were compared with two deterministic capture zones to show how the stochastic approach preserves the discontinuous character of the impeding clay layer while the deterministic approach smooths out the discontinuities. Furthermore, it is shown how the stochastic approach reveals the uncertainty about the location of the capture zones while the deterministic approach obscures it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leeuwen et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: