Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper suggests that current ways of thinking about disability are inadequate, both theoretically and as a basis for social policy. The main reason for this is that most writers have remained locked within a ‘personal tragedy theory of disability’ and have failed to examine the concept of disability critically. Even those writers who have attempted to take disability seriously have failed to move beyond a traditional framework and have subsequently produced sterile accounts. The final section of the paper begins to suggest what a social theory of disability might look like.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mike Oliver (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: