PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2020Annals of Internal Medicine134 citations

Effect of Acupuncture for Postprandial Distress Syndrome

View Full Paper
JYJing‐Wen YangLWLi‐Qiong WangXZXuan Zou

Key Result

Acupuncture significantly increased the response rate compared to sham acupuncture (83.0% vs 51.6%; difference 31.4 percentage points, 95% CI 20.3-42.5; P<0.001) in patients with PDS.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=278)

Blinding

Single-blind

Randomization

Randomized

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does acupuncture improve response rate and eliminate cardinal symptoms in patients with Postprandial Distress Syndrome?

P
Population
278 Chinese patients aged 18 to 65 years meeting Rome IV criteria for Postprandial Distress Syndrome (PDS).
I
Intervention
12 sessions of acupuncture over 4 weeks (thrice-weekly).
C
Comparator
12 sessions of sham acupuncture over 4 weeks.
O
Outcome
Response rate based on overall treatment effect and the elimination rate of all 3 cardinal symptoms (postprandial fullness, upper abdominal bloating, and early satiation) after 4 weeks of treatment.patient reported

Acupuncture significantly improved symptoms and response rates in patients with postprandial distress syndrome compared to sham acupuncture.

Main Result

Effect estimate: Difference 31.4 percentage points (95% CI 20.3-42.5)

Absolute Event Rate: 83% vs 51.6%

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • Lack of objective outcomes and daily measurement
  • High dropout rate
  • Inability to blind acupuncturists
  • high dropout rate
  • inability to blind acupuncturists

Abstract

Background: Postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) is the most common subtype of functional dyspepsia. Acupuncture is commonly used to treat PDS, but its effect is uncertain because of the poor quality of prior studies. Objective: To assess the efficacy of acupuncture versus sham acupuncture in patients with PDS. Design: Multicenter, 2-group, randomized clinical trial. (ISRCTN registry number: ISRCTN12511434) Setting: 5 tertiary hospitals in China. Participants: Chinese patients aged 18 to 65 years meeting Rome IV criteria for PDS. Intervention: 12 sessions of acupuncture or sham acupuncture over 4 weeks. Measurements: The 2 primary outcomes were the response rate based on overall treatment effect and the elimination rate of all 3 cardinal symptoms: postprandial fullness, upper abdominal bloating, and early satiation after 4 weeks of treatment. Participants were followed until week 16. Results: Among the 278 randomly assigned participants, 228 (82%) completed outcome measurements at week 16. The estimated response rate from generalized linear mixed models at week 4 was 83.0% in the acupuncture group versus 51.6% in the sham acupuncture group (difference, 31.4 percentage points 95% CI, 20.3 to 42.5 percentage points; P < 0.001). The estimated elimination rate of all 3 cardinal symptoms was 27.8% in the acupuncture group versus 17.3% in the sham acupuncture group (difference, 10.5 percentage points CI, 0.08 to 20.9 percentage points; P = 0.034). The efficacy of acupuncture was maintained during the 12-week posttreatment follow-up. There were no serious adverse events. Limitation: Lack of objective outcomes and daily measurement, high dropout rate, and inability to blind acupuncturists. Conclusion: Among patients with PDS, acupuncture resulted in increased response rate and elimination rate of all 3 cardinal symptoms compared with sham acupuncture, with sustained efficacy over 12 weeks in patients who received thrice-weekly acupuncture for 4 weeks. Primary Funding Source: Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) (n=278). Acupuncture vs. Sham acupuncture was evaluated on Response rate based on overall treatment effect at 4 weeks (Difference 31.4 percentage points, 95% CI 20.3-42.5, p=<0.001). Acupuncture significantly increased the response rate compared to sham acupuncture (83.0% vs 51.6%; difference 31.4 percentage points, 95% CI 20.3-42.5; P<0.001) in patients with PDS.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10b16acfa01e990d9f567bhttps://doi.org/10.7326/m19-2880
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper