Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
How do ruling political parties accommodate their members’ demand for access to state patronage with a push for merit-based bureaucratic reform? I argue that political commitment to reform is contingent on electoral calculations within the party. Therefore, distortions in reform implementation reveal not only dynamics within the party itself, but also the significance of appointing the right bureaucrats to the right posts to regulate access to patronage. Drawing on qualitative fieldwork in Punjab, I contextualise political commitment to bureaucratic reform to provide an explanation for their unsustainability and for persistently low state capacity in countries with weak, patronage-reliant parties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sameen A. Mohsin Ali (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: