Key result
An endovascular-first protocol for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms significantly reduced 30-day mortality compared to the preprotocol period (14.3% vs 32.6%; P=0.03).
Why the study?
Does an endovascular-first protocol improve survival and clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms compared to a preprotocol strategy?
Cohort (n=88)
No
Does an endovascular-first protocol improve survival and clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms compared to a preprotocol strategy?
Absolute Event Rate: 14.3% vs 32.6%
p-value: p=.03
Implementation of an endovascular-first protocol for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms is associated with decreased perioperative morbidity and mortality, and improved long-term survival.
May support endovascular-first protocols for ruptured AAA; leaves open causality and generalizability pending RCTs.
IMPORTANCE: Mortality after an open surgical repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) remains high. The role and clinical benefit of ruptured endovascular aneurysm repair (rEVAR) have yet to be fully elucidated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of an endovascular-first protocol for patients with an rAAA on perioperative mortality and associated early clinical outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients presenting with an rAAA before (1997-2006) and after (2007-2014) implementation of an endovascular-first treatment strategy (ie, protocol) at an academic medical center. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Early mortality, perioperative morbidity, discharge disposition, and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients with an rAAA were included in the analysis, including 46 patients in the preprotocol group (87.0% underwent an open repair and 13.0% underwent an rEVAR) and 42 patients in the intention-to-treat postprotocol group (33.3% underwent an open repair and 66.7% underwent an rEVAR; P = .001). Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Postprotocol patients died significantly less often at 30 days (14.3% vs 32.6%; P = .03), had a decreased incidence of major complications (45.0% vs 71.8%; P = .02), and had a greater likelihood of discharge to home (69.2% vs 42.1%; P = .04) after rAAA repair compared with preprotocol patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly greater long-term survival in the postprotocol period (log-rank P = .002). One-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 50.0%, 45.7%, and 39.1% for open repair, respectively, and 61.9%, 42.9%, and 23.8% for rEVAR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Implementation of a contemporary endovascular-first protocol for the treatment of an rAAA is associated with decreased perioperative morbidity and mortality, a higher likelihood of discharge to home, and improved long-term survival. Patients with an rAAA and appropriate anatomy should be offered endovascular repair as first-line treatment at experienced vascular centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ullery et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) (n=88). Endovascular-first protocol vs. Preprotocol group was evaluated on 30-day mortality (p=.03). An endovascular-first protocol for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms significantly reduced 30-day mortality compared to the preprotocol period (14.3% vs 32.6%; P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: