This paper examines the inclusion and exclusion of policy issues in the peacebuilding agenda through a constructivist lens, providing a framework for analysing how social problems are ‘framed’ and ‘owned’ in post-conflict settings. It argues that policy issues become part of the agenda through the deliberate mobilization of a variety of both international and domestic actors and institutions over time. Empirically, the framework is applied to land policy in Côte d’Ivoire, a case that illustrates the fluid relationship between peacebuilding and development. The analysis reveals how land policy moved from being central to post-war reconstruction to being reframed within development and security paradigms, reflecting shifting donor priorities and domestic politics. These findings highlight the broader implications of peacebuilding as a contextually embedded, iterative process that reconfigures existing policy sectors. By focusing on the interplay between global and local dynamics of policymaking, this research contributes to a better understanding of the temporal and political mechanisms that shape peacebuilding interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grajales et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: