PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2019American Economic Review160 citationsOpen Access

An Economic Analysis of Privacy Protection and Statistical Accuracy as Social Choices

JAJohn M. AbowdISIan M. Schmutte

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Statistical agencies face a dual mandate to publish accurate statistics while protecting respondent privacy. Increasing privacy protection requires decreased accuracy. Recognizing this as a resource allocation problem, we propose an economic solution: operate where the marginal cost of increasing privacy equals the marginal benefit. Our model of production, from computer science, assumes data are published using an efficient differentially private algorithm. Optimal choice weighs the demand for accurate statistics against the demand for privacy. Examples from US statistical programs show how our framework can guide decision-making. Further progress requires a better understanding of willingness-to-pay for privacy and statistical accuracy. (JEL C38, C81, D83)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abowd et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10b88d39dd87f6d0ee3ae4https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20170627
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Accuracy of the 1990 Census and Undercount Adjustments1993 · 31 citations
  2. 2Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias1965 · 3,031 citations
  3. 3Should We Treat Data as Labor? Moving Beyond “Free”2018 · 182 citations
  4. 4Resolving Individuals Contributing Trace Amounts of DNA to Highly Complex Mixtures Using High-Density SNP Genotyping Microarrays2008 · 1,267 citations
  5. 5Social Security Bulletin2018 · 1,696 citations