Key result
Higher levels of formal education significantly reduced the diabetes risk score by 38% compared to having no education among older urban populations.
Why the study?
Does education and knowledge type affect preventive behaviour and diabetes risk in older urban populations?
Cross-Sectional (n=356)
Does education and knowledge type affect preventive behaviour and diabetes risk in older urban populations?
Effect estimate: Coefficient -0.801
p-value: p=<0.05
In older urban populations, the social dimension of education is a stronger determinant of healthy lifestyles and lower diabetes risk than factual knowledge alone.
May inform education-focused diabetes prevention in older urban adults; cross-sectional data leaves causal effects open for prospective confirmation.
The association between education and risk of getting diabetes is established in the context of primary prevention. Yet, the determinants that can account for this association are under-analysed, particularly regarding older people living in cities. This article addresses this gap in an explorative study (n=356), focusing in older people in vulnerable urban areas of Lisbon, Portugal. The analysis focuses on data drawn from interviews and surveys analysed by regression methods. The data includes variables accounting for socio-demographic condition, risk perception, risks of having diabetes based on FINDRISC scores, and habits related to modifiable risk factors. The analysis suggests that: 1) the role of education (a formal knowledge type) is connected with healthy lifestyles, underlining the role of values and social rules; 2) risk perceptions and factual knowledge per se do not seem to be the most adequate to foment behavioural change in older people; and 3) a knowledge typology is proposed for a first-step conceptual framework applied to the older, lower educated, urban populations. The article concludes that education’s social dimension has a strong effect on risk of developing diabetes than knowledge per se. This highlights the need of considering other aspects of preventing disease beyond the more often used traditional strategies. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n5p249
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pádua et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Diabetes risk (n=356). Formal education (Secondary and Higher) vs. No education was evaluated on Diabetes risk score (FINDRISC) (Coefficient -0.801, p=<0.05). Higher levels of formal education significantly reduced the diabetes risk score by 38% compared to having no education among older urban populations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: