Key result
Patient age independently influenced decision-making about angina investigation and treatment by 46% of GPs and geriatricians, and 48% of cardiologists, who treated patients aged ≥65 differently.
Why the study?
Does a patient's age influence doctors' decisions regarding the investigation and treatment of angina?
Cross-Sectional (n=85)
Yes
Does a patient's age influence doctors' decisions regarding the investigation and treatment of angina?
Nearly half of doctors across primary and secondary care alter their investigation and treatment decisions for angina based solely on patient age, independent of comorbidity.
Potential age bias in angina decisions warrants clinician awareness; leaves open whether education or guidelines reduce disparities.
BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with cardiovascular disease are relatively undertreated and undertested. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether, and how, individual doctors are influenced by a patient's age in their investigation and treatment of angina. DESIGN: Process-based judgment analysis using electronic patients, semistructured interviews. SETTING: Primary Care, Care of the Elderly and Cardiology in England. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty five doctors: 29 cardiologists, 28 care of the elderly specialists and 28 general practitioners (GPs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Testing and treatment decisions on hypothetical patients. RESULTS: Forty six per cent of GPs and care of the elderly doctors, and 48% of cardiologists treated patients aged 65+ differently to those under 65, independent of comorbidity. This effect was evident on several decisions: elderly patients were less likely to be prescribed a statin given a cholesterol test, referred to a cardiologist, given an exercise tolerance test, angiography and revascularisation; more likely to have their current prescriptions changed and to be given a follow-up appointment. There was no effect of specialty, gender or years of training on influence of patient age. Those doctors who were influenced by age were on average five years older than those who were not. Interviews revealed that some doctors saw old age as a contraindication to treat. CONCLUSIONS: Age, independent of comorbidity, presentation and patients' wishes, directly influenced decision-making about angina investigation and treatment by half of the doctors in the primary and secondary care samples. Doctors explicitly reasoned about the direct influence of age and age-associated influences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harries et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in Angina (n=85). Patient age (≥65 vs <65 years) was evaluated on Testing and treatment decisions on hypothetical patients. Patient age independently influenced decision-making about angina investigation and treatment by 46% of GPs and geriatricians, and 48% of cardiologists, who treated patients aged ≥65 differently.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: