Why the study?
Does minimal invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery improve long-term survival in patients with ejection fraction ≤30%?
Does minimal invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery improve long-term survival in patients with ejection fraction ≤30%?
MIDCAB provides a viable targeted revascularization option with acceptable long-term survival for high-risk patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (EF ≤30%).
MIDCAB survival in EF ≤30% may support targeted use; leaves open randomized trials versus PCI or conventional CABG.
Objective The long-term survival after minimal invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery to any coronary territory in patients with ejection fraction of ≤30% was investigated for the first time in literature. Methods Seventy-three patients with primary MIDCAB and 89 patients with reoperative MIDCAB were studied including preoperative risk factors, operative details, early postoperative complications, and survival up to 10 years postoperatively. Results Despite the high-risk profile of the patients, the MIDCAB approach for targeted revascularization resulted in excellent short-term results. Ventricular arrhythmia contributed to four of six early deaths. Survival at 5 years postoperatively was 62.5% for primary MIDCAB and 43.2% for reoperative MIDCAB and at 10 years was 36.9% and 29.5%, respectively. Functionally complete vascularization correlates with significantly better long-term survival particularly in primary MIDCAB procedures. Conclusions MIDCAB is a valuable option for targeted revascularization in high-risk patients with low ejection fraction and reoperation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gorki et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: