Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to examine associations between injury perceptions, coping, distress and outcome after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). DESIGN: A prospective observational study with repeated measures. This study reports results from the first of two study visits. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n = 147) were recruited within 3 months following presentation to a concussion clinic or an emergency department setting. METHODS: Clinical and demographic information was collected and participants completed a range of questionnaires (Revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire, Brief COPE, Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire, Rivermead Follow-Up Questionnaire and HADS). Associations between independent variables and outcome were examined using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Preliminary results suggested participants endorsing stronger beliefs about the injury identity (p < 0.05) and emotional impact (p < 0.01) had significantly greater odds of poor outcome at 3 months. There were also associations between higher educational attainment (p < 0.05), using active coping strategies (p < 0.06) and poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: These variables appeared important determinants of outcome early after MTBI and may help identify those at risk for slow recovery. Current reassurance-based interventions may be improved by targeting such variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Snell et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: