Key result
Deep learning-based reconstruction with complex difference estimation (CD-DL) provided higher accuracy and precision than PICS for peak velocity (bias 2.8 vs 3.9) and total flow measurements.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to develop and validate a deep learning-based reconstruction framework for highly accelerated 2D phase-contrast MRI that provides accurate and precise quantitative measurements.
Does a deep learning-based reconstruction framework (CD-DL) improve the accuracy and precision of peak velocity and total flow measurements in accelerated 2D PC-MRI compared to PICS in pediatric patients?
Does a deep learning-based reconstruction framework (CD-DL) improve the accuracy and precision of peak velocity and total flow measurements in accelerated 2D PC-MRI compared to PICS in pediatric patients?
A deep learning-based reconstruction framework (CD-DL) enables highly accelerated (up to 9x) 2D phase-contrast cardiovascular MRI with high accuracy and precision for peak velocity and total flow measurements in pediatric patients.
May facilitate accelerated pediatric PC-MRI; extends DL reconstruction evidence but remains hypothesis-generating pending prospective trials.
Purpose To develop and validate a deep learning‐based reconstruction framework for highly accelerated two‐dimensional (2D) phase contrast (PC‐MRI) data with accurate and precise quantitative measurements. Methods We propose a modified DL‐ESPIRiT reconstruction framework for 2D PC‐MRI, comprised of an unrolled neural network architecture with a Complex Difference estimation (CD‐DL). CD‐DL was trained on 155 fully sampled 2D PC‐MRI pediatric clinical datasets. The fully sampled data () was retrospectively undersampled (6–11) and reconstructed using CD‐DL and a parallel imaging and compressed sensing method (PICS). Measurements of peak velocity and total flow were compared to determine the highest acceleration rate that provided accuracy and precision within . Feasibility of CD‐DL was demonstrated on prospectively undersampled datasets acquired in pediatric clinical patients () and compared to traditional parallel imaging (PI) and PICS. Results The retrospective evaluation showed that 9 accelerated 2D PC‐MRI images reconstructed with CD‐DL provided accuracy and precision (bias, [95 confidence intervals]) within . CD‐DL showed higher accuracy and precision compared to PICS for measurements of peak velocity (2.8 [, 4.5] vs. 3.9 [, 4.9]) and total flow (1.8 [, 3.4] vs. 2.9 [, 6.9]). The prospective feasibility study showed that CD‐DL provided higher accuracy and precision than PICS for measurements of peak velocity and total flow. Conclusion In a retrospective evaluation, CD‐DL produced quantitative measurements of 2D PC‐MRI peak velocity and total flow with error in both accuracy and precision for up to 9 acceleration. Clinical feasibility was demonstrated using a prospective clinical deployment of our 8 undersampled acquisition and CD‐DL reconstruction in a cohort of pediatric patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oscanoa et al. (2022) studied Pediatric cardiovascular MRI (n=155). Complex Difference estimation deep learning reconstruction (CD-DL) vs. Parallel imaging and compressed sensing (PICS) was evaluated on Accuracy and precision of peak velocity. Deep learning-based reconstruction with complex difference estimation (CD-DL) provided higher accuracy and precision than PICS for peak velocity (bias 2.8 vs 3.9) and total flow measurements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: