Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We propose a technique for assessing robustness to demand effects of findings from experiments and surveys. The core idea is that by deliberately inducing demand in a structured way we can bound its influence. We present a model in which participants respond to their beliefs about the researcher’s objectives. Bounds are obtained by manipulating those beliefs with “demand treatments.” We apply the method to 11 classic tasks, and estimate bounds averaging 0.13 standard deviations, suggesting that typical demand effects are probably modest. We also show how to compute demand-robust treatment effects and how to structurally estimate the model. (JEL C83, C90, D83, D91)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jonathan de Quidt
Queen Mary University of London
Johannes Haushofer
Cornell University
Christopher Roth
Flatiron Health (United States)
American Economic Review
University of Oxford
Princeton University
Stockholm University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Quidt et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10ccc82c0ee39daeee3d72 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171330
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: