This essay uncovers how queer rage can motivate and inspire change within eighteenth-century studies. Paying homage to Susan Stryker’s foundational work on transgender rage and monstrosity, I present a performance piece that endeavours to rage against the “eighteenth-century machine” and its long and enduring histories of queer erasure and gaslighting, which are always sub-tended by intersectional discriminations. As I term it, the eighteenth-century machine demands a mechanization of conduct, affect, and performance that has been safeguarded and mobilized by a totalizing white supremacy upon which the vast majority of learned societies are built. Queer rage here attempts to call out these stifling arrangements and seek remediation. Through a series of vignettes, this reflection addresses how rage, clarity, queerness’s polyphony, and citational praxes may become an incendiary politics by which eighteenth-century studies can give up its pernicious ghosts and rise from the pyre.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeremy Chow (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: