Key result
The NanoString nCounter assay identified fusion genes in 96 of 212 sarcoma cases, including 15 missed by standard clinical assays, with 0 false positives and 4 false negatives.
Why the study?
Does the NanoString nCounter Sarcoma Fusion CodeSet reliably identify fusion genes in sarcomas compared to standard clinical assays?
Observational (n=212)
Does the NanoString nCounter Sarcoma Fusion CodeSet reliably identify fusion genes in sarcomas compared to standard clinical assays?
The NanoString nCounter Sarcoma Fusion CodeSet is a reliable and cost-effective first-line diagnostic test for identifying fusion genes in sarcomas, detecting fusions missed by standard clinical assays.
May support adjunctive sarcoma fusion detection; leaves open first-line adoption pending prospective validation.
The NanoString nCounter assay is a high-throughput hybridization technique using target-specific probes that can be customized to test for numerous fusion transcripts in a single assay using RNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material. We designed a NanoString assay targeting 174 unique fusion junctions in 25 sarcoma types. The study cohort comprised 212 cases, 96 of which showed fusion gene expression by the NanoString assay, including all 20 Ewing sarcomas, 11 synovial sarcomas, and 5 myxoid liposarcomas tested. Among these 96 cases, 15 showed fusion expression not identified by standard clinical assay, including EWSR1-FLI1, EWSR1-ERG, BCOR-CCNB3, ZC3H7B-BCOR, HEY1-NCOA2, CIC-DUX4, COL1A1-PDGFB, MYH9-USP6, YAP1-TFE3, and IRF2BP2-CDX1 fusions. There were no false-positive results; however, four cases were false negative when compared with clinically available fluorescence in situ hybridization or RT-PCR testing. When batched as six cases, the per-sample reagent cost was less than conventional techniques, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization, with technologist hands-on time of 1.2 hours per case and assay time of 36 hours. In summary, the NanoString nCounter Sarcoma Fusion CodeSet reliably and cost-effectively identifies fusion genes in sarcomas using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material, including many fusions missed by standard clinical assays, and can serve as a first-line clinical diagnostic test for sarcoma fusion gene identification, replacing multiple individual clinical assays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Sarcoma (n=212). NanoString nCounter Sarcoma Fusion CodeSet vs. Standard clinical assays (FISH or RT-PCR) was evaluated on Detection of fusion gene expression. The NanoString nCounter assay identified fusion genes in 96 of 212 sarcoma cases, including 15 missed by standard clinical assays, with 0 false positives and 4 false negatives.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: