Theoretical analysis uncovers mechanisms of informal power among lower-level organizational participants, highlighting how control over information and structural position creates influence.
This paper explores various factors that account for the power of secretaries, hospital attendants, prison inmates, and other lower participants within organizations. Power is seen as resulting from access to and control over persons, information, and instrumentalities. Among the variables discussed affecting power are normative definitions, perception of legitimacy, exchange, and coalitions. Personal attributes related to power include commitment, effort, interest, willingness to use power, skills, and attractiveneses. Finally, various attributes of social structure are discussed which also help to account for the power of lower participants: time spent in the organization, centrality of position, duality of power structures, and replaceability of persons.' David Mechanic is assistant professor of sociology, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Mechanic (1962) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: