BACKGROUND: Current evidence has established disparities in ED utilization across various demographic and socioeconomic groups. However, there is a paucity of recent evidence exploring the interaction of multiple sociodemographic variables and their influence on emergency department (ED) utilization. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence and interaction of multiple sociodemographic variables on ED utilization. METHODS: Cross-sectional, population-based logistic regression analyses were conducted using the 2023 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data. RESULTS: Adjusted odds of ED utilization were significantly higher among female (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.21-1.41, p < 0.001), Black (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.31, p = 0.014) and American Indian/Alaskan (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.04-1.81, p = 0.026) individuals. Compared to ages 18-25, individuals aged 50-74 (p < 0.05) had lower odds. Compared to participants >5x poverty threshold, those with income 2-5x poverty threshold, 1-2x poverty threshold, and <1x poverty threshold had 19% (p < 0.001), 40% (p < 0.001) and 52% (p < 0.001) increased odds of ED utilization, respectively. Individuals with Medicaid/public insurance (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.29-1.59, p < 0.001) and high school education (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.23, p = 0.025) had higher odds of ED utilization compared to those with private insurance and college education. Those without access to a usual place of care (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60-0.82, p < 0.001) had lower odds. Compared to participants in good health, those in fair (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.84-2.25, p < 0.001) or poor (OR 4.4, 95% CI 3.77-5.24, p < 0.001) health had higher odds of ED visits. CONCLUSIONS: Sex, age, race, income, insurance coverage, education, self-reported health status and access to care are significant predictors of ED visits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abbas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: