Retrospective cohort study reveals high demographic and clinical concordance between a four-million claims sample and national data, highlighting its utility for population-level health research.
Objectives The aim of this study was to describe the sampling strategy as well as characteristics and the external validity of a representative sample database drawn from the German InGef research database. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study using anonymized claims data for the year 2019. Methods The InGef research database is an anonymized healthcare database with longitudinal claims data from approximately 8.8 Mio insurees. A sample of four million insurees was drawn intended to be representative for the German population with respect to age, sex and region. In addition to demographic information, data on hospitalization rates, mortality rates and drug prescription rates was analysed from the InGef sample database for the year 2019 to demonstrate validity and representativeness. Corresponding national reference data were obtained from official sources. Results The distributions of sex and age were similar in the InGef sample database and Germany (proportion of women: 50.8% vs. 50.7%; mean age: 44.1 vs 43.9 years). The proportion of insurees living in the eastern part of Germany was lower in the InGef sample database (16.5% vs. 19.5 %). There was good accordance with German reference data with respect to hospitalization rates and overall mortality rates. Prescription rates for the 20 most often reimbursed drug classes were slightly higher in the InGef sample database. Conclusions The InGef sample database shows good overall agreement with the German population on measures of morbidity, mortality, and drug usage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ludwig et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: