Key result
This review summarizes current evidence for lifestyle, pharmaceutical, and physical interventions used to treat angina and their impact on cardiovascular outcomes.
Why the study?
Do ischaemia treatments modify angina and improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with angina pectoris?
Do ischaemia treatments modify angina and improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with angina pectoris?
This review provides an appraisal of the evidence for various angina treatments and their role in preventing adverse cardiac events.
Angina pectoris is the symptomatic manifestation of transient myocardial ischaemia. At the most fundamental level, angina arises when myocardial oxygen demand exceeds the ability of the coronary circulation to provide adequate oxygen delivery to maintain normal myocardial metabolic function. In vivo, the balance of oxygen demand and delivery is a complex physiological process that can be altered by a variety of interventions. Lifestyle modification is a cornerstone of cardiovascular disease management, with or without angina. Additional pharmaceutical and physical interventions are usually applied to patients with angina. Mechanisms of action for these interventions include heart rate modulation, vascular smooth muscle relaxation, metabolic manipulation, revascularization, and others. A number of these interventions have overlapping mechanisms that target angina. Additionally, some interventions may directly or indirectly prevent or delay adverse outcomes such as myocardial infarction or death. This review summarizes current evidence for many applied ischaemia treatments documented to modify angina and comments on available evidence relating to improvement in cardiovascular outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winchester et al. (2015) conducted a review in Angina pectoris. Angina treatments (lifestyle, pharmaceutical, and physical interventions) was evaluated. This review summarizes current evidence for lifestyle, pharmaceutical, and physical interventions used to treat angina and their impact on cardiovascular outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: