Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Seven experiments were conducted to examine the role of attention in automatization. Ss searched 2-word displays for members of a target category in divided-attention, focused-attention, and dual-task conditions. The main issue was whether attention conditions would affect what Ss learned about co-occurrences of the words in the displays. The attention hypothesis, derived from the instance theory of automaticity, predicts learning of co-occurrences in divided-attention and dual-task conditions in which Ss attend to both words but not in focused-attention conditions in which Ss only attend to 1 word. The data supported the attention hypothesis and therefore the instance theory. This article concerns what is learned during automatization. This is an important question in the automaticity literature, especially from the perspective of memory-based theories, such as the instance theory of automaticity (Logan, 1988,1990, 1992). Memory-based theories assume that automatic performance is based on retrieval of representations of past solutions from memory. What "gets into " those representations during learning and what is "taken out " of them during automatic
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Logan et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: