This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The free-field speech-reception threshold (SRT) for sentences was investigated in quiet and under nine conditions involving noise or competing speech for a group of 20 elderly subjects (ten male, age 75-85; ten female, age 76-88) and a reference group of ten young normal-hearing subjects. The noise source had the same long-term average spectrum as the competing speech. The interfering signals were presented at a constant level of 55 dBA. All elderly subjects had moderate, nearly symmetrical pure-tone hearing losses with an average loss at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz of between 9 and 40 dB re: ISO-389. The main results are (1) the SRT values in noise and competing speech are about equal, whereas the normal-hearing subjects showed a lower SRT (7 dB lower for the condition that both sound sources are in front) in competing speech than in noise; apparently, the elderly subjects do not benefit from the relatively silent periods in competing speech; (2) the gain obtained by moving the interfering noise source from the front to the lateral position is only 2.5 dB, in contrast to a gain of 9.6 dB for the young subjects; apparently, the elderly are unable to make full use of the spatial divergence between primary speaker and noise source.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. J. Duquesnoy (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: