The emphasis placed on prolonged engagement, fieldwork, and participant observation has prevented wide-scale use of ethnography in counseling psychology. This article provides a discussion of ethnog-raphy in terms of definition, process, and potential ethical dilemmas. The authors propose that ethno-graphically informed methods can enhance counseling psychology research conducted with multicultural communities and provide better avenues toward a contextual understanding of diversity as it relates to professional inquiry. Ethnography constitutes a major focus in the psychological literature; however, debates continue regarding the usage of these qualitative methods (Denzin & Lincoln, 2000a). Despite the fact that ethnographic methods fall within the purview of postpositiv-ism and constructivism–interpretivism frameworks, positivists, postpositivists, and postmodernists currently argue over the defi-nition of ethnography and criteria for evaluating ethnographic work. This article seeks to explore the meanings and manifesta-tions of ethnography, as well as the utility of these methods for
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: