This article examines the process of specifying a question‐answering help facility in the context of UNIX mail. The specification was based upon experimental expert‐user facilitative dialogues. These dialogues were analyzed using a classification scheme developed for the purpose. The scheme provides a metalanguage for describing patterns of intent and rhetorical structure in dialogue. Using the scheme as a tool, common patterns in expert‐user dialogue emerged, providing insights into both tutoring strategy and the linguistic forms required to generate help output. These were refined to form a set of frames consisting of stereotypical patterns of rhetorical predicates to answer different types of questions which could be adapted to the needs of a particular user. The significance of the system developed from this specification is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rachel Pilkington (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: