Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When using the chi square test to compare the proportions of successes in two independent binomial samples, a new continuity correction is proposed, which equals half the size of the smaller sample. Exact computations of unconditional tail‐probabilities, together with a theoretical argument, show that this correction is more appropriate than the YATES correction. This version of the chi square test is still conservative, but less so, and as a consequence more powerful, than the YATES corrected test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schouten et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: