When using the chi square test to compare the proportions of successes in two independent binomial samples, a new continuity correction is proposed, which equals half the size of the smaller sample. Exact computations of unconditional tail‐probabilities, together with a theoretical argument, show that this correction is more appropriate than the YATES correction. This version of the chi square test is still conservative, but less so, and as a consequence more powerful, than the YATES corrected test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schouten et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: