Key result
Telehealth group visits for T2D and CKD achieve 72% attendance and are linked to improved HbA1c.
Why the study?
Despite the need to leverage telehealth to support self-management for patients with CKD, scant evidence exists on how to adapt evidence-based in-person group visit models for telehealth delivery.
Does a telehealth-adapted group visit model improve feasibility and clinical outcomes in adults with T2D and stage 3b or 4 CKD?
Observational (n=25)
Does a telehealth-adapted group visit model improve feasibility and clinical outcomes in adults with T2D and stage 3b or 4 CKD?
Adapting an in-person group visit model to telehealth is feasible and may improve glycemic control in patients with T2D and late-stage CKD.
May support telehealth group visits in T2D-CKD; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
Key Points Improving late stage diabetic kidney disease care requires adapting evidence-based, self-management programs for telehealth delivery. We adapted and pilot-tested a telehealth approach and found it to be feasible. Preliminary data suggested it improved relevant health and patient-recorded outcomes. Background The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic resulted in an unprecedented shift in the delivery of outpatient medical care, including the rapid transition of services from in-person to telehealth. We adapted an evidence-based personalized health planning group visit care model traditionally offered in-person to telehealth to support the care of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and CKD. Despite the need to leverage telehealth technologies to better support self-management for patients with CKD, scant evidence exists on how to do so. Methods We conducted prospective adaptations of in-person evidence-based group visit model for telehealth delivery for patients with CKD and T2D. Intervention adaptations are reported using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications–Expanded taxonomy. The adapted virtual group visit care model was pilot-tested among adults with T2D and stage 3b or 4 CKD. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, attendance, satisfaction, and self-reported goal progress. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and included hemoglobin A1c, diastolic and systolic BP, body mass index, and eGFR. Results Adaptation areas included outreach, visit format, educational materials design and access, staffing, and patient engagement strategies. 39% (43) of patients (110) contacted verbalized interest, and 58% (25) of those participated. 72% completed >6 group sessions. 68% of patients reported completing one or more health goals, with nutrition and physical activity being the most common. We observed a statistically significant improvement in hemoglobin A1c ( P = 0.0176) 6 months postprogram participation. Conclusions Adapting evidence-based interventions for telehealth delivery is challenging because of the risk of altering an intervention's core components responsible for observed benefits. We adapted an in-person group visit model for the care of T2D and CKD for telehealth delivery. The telehealth approach was feasible, and preliminary data suggested it improved relevant health and patient-recorded outcomes up to 6 months postprogram completion. The approaches used here may be applicable to the adaptation of other clinical programs for telehealth delivery. Podcast This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/K360/2023_12_29_KID0000000000000301.mp3
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drake et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and stage 3b or 4 CKD (n=25). Telehealth-adapted personalized health planning group visits was evaluated on Feasibility (recruitment, attendance, satisfaction, goal progress) and clinical outcomes (hemoglobin A1c, BP, BMI, eGFR) (p=0.0176). A telehealth-adapted group visit model for adults with T2D and CKD was feasible, with 72% completing >6 sessions and a significant improvement in hemoglobin A1c at 6 months (P=0.0176).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: