This article explores the relationship between activism, sociality and place. It analyses a case-study of selected social relations produced through activities related to an urban social movement - the UK network of the international Cittàslow (Slow City) movement. It specifically examines how social relationships contribute to the human agency that Cittàslow activism involves. In a recent Cultural Studies analysis of the Cittàslow movement, Wendy Parkins and Geoffrey Craig (2006) Parkins, Wendy and Geoffrey, Craig. 2006. Slow Living, Oxford: Berg. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar] have suggested that Cittàslow ‘communities’ drive processes of change. Here, following social anthropologists (Creed 2006; Amit in Amit & Rapport 2002) who call for an interrogation of the concept of ‘community’ in its local and academic uses, I propose a different analytical route. I suggest that Cittàslow activism is better understood by analysing how agency is produced through actual local embodied social relationships.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarah Pink (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: