The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a dyadic peer-mediated treatment on kindergarten children's mathematics development. Within schools, 20 classrooms were assigned randomly to experimental or control groups. Experimental teachers implemented the peer-mediated treatment twice weekly for 15 weeks. We measured the fidelity of treatment implementation, and teachers completed questionnaires about treatment effectiveness and feasibility. Within classrooms, we pre- and post-tested 168 students (84 per condition) who had been classified into achievement groups based on pretest scores; effects were separated for students identified for or referred to special education and for nondisabled low-, middle-, and high-achieving classmates. Results indicated that treatment implementation was strong for most, but not all, teachers; teachers judged the treatment to be effective and feasible for implementation on their own; and students with and without disabilities, at all points along the achievement continuum, benefited from the treatment. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fuchs et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: