A group-type analysis of hydrocarbons in a complex jet fuel may be more useful than attempting to analyze every component because the latter inevitably leaves a large portion of the fuel unidentified. While it may be difficult to accurately determine the identity of a particular compound, that compound can often be classified as belonging to a group or compound class because of its chromatographic retention and mass spectral properties. Compound class quantitation is often capable of relating compositional information to fuel properties. Two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) is a technique capable of providing this group-type separation and quantitation in jet fuels. This technique was used to examine a large set of fuels (Jet A, Jet A-1, JP-5, and JP-8, primarily) from petroleum sources and non-petroleum alternative sources, such as synthetic paraffinic kerosene (SPK). By comparing results from GC × GC analysis to established techniques and model compound studies, we have found that the accuracy of GC × GC for group-type analysis is excellent. Quantitation of group types for alternative fuel sources were also investigated and compared to conventional techniques. The possible uses and applications of group-type measurements using GC × GC for fuels and fuel-related materials are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Striebich et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: