Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Purpose: The gender minority stress model has been proposed by researchers to explain the high rates of substance use found within transgender communities, but its explanatory power has never been directly tested. Further, qualitative research has noted that premedically transitioned and nonbinary individuals are more likely to engage in avoidant coping such as drinking to cope. As such, the current study tested the relationship between proximal stress (comprised of internalized transphobia, anticipated stigma, concealment, and gender dysphoria), drinking to cope, and problematic alcohol use. Methods: Transgender and nonbinary participants over the age of 18 ( N =297) completed an online survey on alcohol use. To test for differences in drinking to cope across gender identity and medical transition, analysis of variance and independent t -tests were conducted. Further, a structural equation model of proximal stress was developed to test whether drinking to cope mediated the relationship between proximal stress and alcohol use. Results: There were no significant differences across gender identity or medical transition status in severity of drinking to cope. Proximal stress was significantly related to problematic alcohol use and the relationship was explained by an indirect relationship with drinking to cope. Conclusion: Findings from this study suggest that drinking to cope is an important aspect of high rates of alcohol use found in the transgender community. Implications for clinical practice with transgender individuals are discussed.
Lindley et al. (Mon,) studied this question.