Data deluge from remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices and importance of clinical stratification

BackgroundRemote monitoring (RM) has been accepted as a standard of care for follow-up of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, the resulting data deluge poses major challenge to device clinics.ObjectiveThis study aimed to quantify the data deluge from CIED and stratify these data based on clinical relevance.MethodsThe study included patients from 67 device clinics across the United States being remotely monitored by Octagos Health. The CIEDs included implantable loop recorders, pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers. Transmissions were either dismissed before reaching the clinical practice if they were repetitive or redundant or were forwarded if they were either clinically relevant or actionable transmission (alert). The alerts were further classified as level 1, 2, or 3 based on clinical urgency.ResultsA total of 32,721 patients with CIEDs were included. There were 14,465 (44.2%) patients with pacemakers, 8381 (25.6%) with implantable loop recorders, 5351 (16.4%) with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, 3531 (10.8%) with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators, and 993 (3%) with cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers. Over a period of 2 years of RM, 384,796 transmissions were received. Of these, 220,049 (57%) transmissions were dismissed, as they were either redundant or repetitive. Only 164,747 (43%) transmissions were transmitted to the clinicians, of which only 13% (n = 50,440) had clinical alerts, while 30.6% (n = 114,307) were routine transmissions.ConclusionOur study shows that data deluge from RM of CIEDs can be streamlined by utilization of appropriate screening strategies that will enhance efficiency of device clinics and provide better patient care. Remote monitoring (RM) has been accepted as a standard of care for follow-up of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, the resulting data deluge poses major challenge to device clinics. This study aimed to quantify the data deluge from CIED and stratify these data based on clinical relevance. The study included patients from 67 device clinics across the United States being remotely monitored by Octagos Health. The CIEDs included implantable loop recorders, pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers. Transmissions were either dismissed before reaching the clinical practice if they were repetitive or redundant or were forwarded if they were either clinically relevant or actionable transmission (alert). The alerts were further classified as level 1, 2, or 3 based on clinical urgency. A total of 32,721 patients with CIEDs were included. There were 14,465 (44.2%) patients with pacemakers, 8381 (25.6%) with implantable loop recorders, 5351 (16.4%) with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, 3531 (10.8%) with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators, and 993 (3%) with cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers. Over a period of 2 years of RM, 384,796 transmissions were received. Of these, 220,049 (57%) transmissions were dismissed, as they were either redundant or repetitive. Only 164,747 (43%) transmissions were transmitted to the clinicians, of which only 13% (n = 50,440) had clinical alerts, while 30.6% (n = 114,307) were routine transmissions. Our study shows that data deluge from RM of CIEDs can be streamlined by utilization of appropriate screening strategies that will enhance efficiency of device clinics and provide better patient care.