PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 2002Psychosomatic Medicine153 citations

The Depression Interview and Structured Hamilton (DISH): Rationale, Development, Characteristics, and Clinical Validity

View Full Paper
KFKenneth E. Freedland

Structured PICO

Is the Depression Interview and Structured Hamilton (DISH) a valid tool for diagnosing depression in medically ill patients compared to the SCID?

P
Population
57 medically ill patients in the validity study, and patients from the ENRICHD study (post-acute myocardial infarction with depression and low perceived social support)
I
Intervention
Depression Interview and Structured Hamilton (DISH) administration
C
Comparator
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) and clinician diagnosis
O
Outcome
Diagnostic agreement between DISH and SCID/clinician diagnosis

The DISH is a valid and efficient semistructured interview for assessing depression and its severity in medically ill patients, such as those recovering from myocardial infarction.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Depression Interview and Structured Hamilton (DISH) is a semistructured interview developed for the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) study, a multicenter clinical trial of treatment for depression and low perceived social support after acute myocardial infarction. The DISH is designed to diagnose depression in medically ill patients and to assess its severity on an embedded version of Williams' Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression scale (SIGH-D). This article describes the development and characteristics of the DISH and presents a validity study and data on its use in ENRICHD. METHODS: In the validity study, the DISH and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) were administered in randomized order to 57 patients. Trained interviewers administered the DISH, and clinicians administered the SCID. In ENRICHD, trained research nurses administered the DISH and recorded a diagnosis. Clinicians reviewed 42% of the interviews and recorded their own diagnosis. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was administered in both studies. RESULTS: In the validity study, the SCID diagnosis agreed with the DISH on 88% of the interviews (weighted kappa = 0.86). In ENRICHD, the clinicians agreed with 93% of the research nurses' diagnoses. The BDI and the Hamilton depression scores derived from the DISH in the two studies correlated 0.76 (p < .0001) in the validity study and 0.64 (p < .0001) in ENRICHD. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the validity of the DISH as a semistructured interview to assess depression in medically ill patients. The DISH is efficient in yielding both a DSM-IV depression diagnosis and a 17-item Hamilton depression score.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kenneth E. Freedland (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10ef63497e609eda647a1bhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000028826.64279.29
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper