Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
= .0006). The 3-year incidence of relapse was 22% with Flu/Mel compared with 46% with Flu/Bu2 and 56% with Flu/Bu2 + ATG. With only a modest reduction in nonrelapse mortality with the Flu/Bu2 regimens, the higher relapse incidence resulted in lower RFS. The data support optimal RFS with Bu4/Cy, Flu/Bu4, and Flu/Mel regimens for AML in remission or MDS. The low relapse rate with reduced-intensity Flu/Mel resulted in RFS comparable to that after the higher-intensity regimens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eapen et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: