Key result
Distal Doppler ultrasound flow velocity was significantly lower in carotid near-occlusions than conventional stenosis (mean distal PSV 21 and 63 cm/s vs 93 cm/s; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does distal Doppler ultrasound flow velocity measurement improve the identification of carotid near-occlusion in patients with high PSV carotid stenosis?
Observational (n=60)
Does distal Doppler ultrasound flow velocity measurement improve the identification of carotid near-occlusion in patients with high PSV carotid stenosis?
p-value: p=<0.001
Distal Doppler ultrasound flow velocity is significantly lower in carotid near-occlusions compared to conventional stenosis, offering a specific diagnostic parameter to differentiate the two.
Distal PSV may aid near-occlusion identification on ultrasound; leaves open clinical utility pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Most carotid near-occlusions are indistinguishable from conventional ≥ 50% stenosis on ultrasound, demonstrating high peak systolic velocity (PSV) in the stenosis. PURPOSE: To study whether the velocity distal to the stenosis can separate high PSV near-occlusion from conventional ≥ 50% stenosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included patients with ≥ 50% carotid stenosis with high PSV (≥125 cm/s), examined with both computed tomography angiography (CTA) and ultrasound within 30 days, and a distal velocity measurement was performed. Based on CTA, cases were divided into three groups: conventional stenosis; near-occlusion without full collapse (NwoC; normal-appearing albeit small distal artery); and near-occlusion with full collapse (NwC; threadlike distal artery). Distal Doppler ultrasound flow velocities were compared between these groups. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included: 33 patients with conventional stenosis; 20 patients with NwoC; and seven patients with NwC. Mean distal PSV was 93, 63, and 21 cm/s ( P < 0.001) and mean distal end-diastolic velocity was 30, 24, and 5 cm/s ( P < 0.001), respectively. A distal PSV < 50 cm/s was 63% sensitive and 94% specific for separating both types of near-occlusion from conventional stenosis. CONCLUSION: In high PSV carotid stenoses, the distal velocity was lower in near-occlusions than conventional carotid stenosis. Distal velocities warrant further investigation in diagnostic studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johansson et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Carotid stenosis (n=60). Distal Doppler ultrasound flow velocity measurement vs. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) was evaluated on Mean distal peak systolic velocity (PSV) (p=<0.001). Distal Doppler ultrasound flow velocity was significantly lower in carotid near-occlusions than conventional stenosis (mean distal PSV 21 and 63 cm/s vs 93 cm/s; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: