This paper describes how questionnaire administration techniques (such as indication of institutional support for a research topic, anonymity, promise of a feedback of research results) were and can be used to enhance the patterns (quality) of response from potential respondents. It suggests that a properly designed and pretested questionnaire which incorporates an appeal for assistance, guarantees anonymity, promises a feedback of research results and advertises the support of reputable institutions, can influence response rate, response speed, and response completeness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Collier et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: