Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
With this paper I propose a reflection on the way interdisciplinarity is framed in reference to the study of archaeological human remains. It is often taken for granted that interdisciplinarity is valuable for archaeology – but why should it be? By taking the case study of the way ancient genomics research is rewriting the ‘Neolithic Revolution’ narratives I show how the use of scientific methodologies in- fluences and biases the kind of work that gets done and the questions that are asked.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexandra Ion (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: