Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, the seismic performance of a three- and a six-storey steel frame equipped with different bracing configurations is assessed. The bracing systems consist of traditional buckling-restrained steel braces and superelastic Nitinol shape-memory alloy (SMA) braces. Background on the behaviour of SMAs is provided and a state-of-the-art review of the applications of such new materials in earthquake engineering is presented. A uniaxial constitutive model for superelastic SMAs is then implemented into the finite element platform OpenSees and nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed. Finally, the seismic performance of the structures under investigation is judged through the evaluation of several response quantities, to determine the efficacy of the new bracing system in reducing earthquake-induced vibrations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Auricchio et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: