It simply will not do to reject the theoertical centrality of meaning for psychology on the grounds that it is “vague.” Its vagueness was in the eye of yesterday's formalistics logician. We are beyond that now. [Bruner 1990: 65]
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anna Wierzbicka (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: