Apparently overruling earlier decisions, the Supreme Court of has recently declared that a merger effected "for the sole of freezing out minority stockholders ...is an abuse of the process ...[and a] violation of a fiduciary duty for which Court may grant.. . relief." In Singer v. Magnavox Co. a parent had merged with its eighty-four-percent-owned subsidiary. stockholders of the subsidiary had received only cash for their and thus had been eliminated from participation in the combined. The court confirmed that the parent owed a fiduciary to the minority by reason of its status as majority stockholder, but-in what is generally viewed as a new development in Delaware-the court held that this duty would not be met unless a corporate for the merger, other than mere elimination of the minorityheld, were supported by the evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brudney et al. (1978) studied this question.