Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study examined the effects of four coping dimensions—active coping, avoidance, distraction, and support—on conduct problems, depression, and achievement in a multiethnic, inner-city sample of early adolescents. The main effects of coping were examined, along with stress X coping interactions. For girls, active coping interacted with family and community stress to predict conduct problems and grades, respectively, and with community stress to predict depression. These interactions revealed a classic stress-buffering effect for active coping. For boys, although active coping interacted with community and peer stress to predict depression and with community and family stress to predict grades, these findings did not support the stress-buffering effect. Although avoidant coping was positively associated with depression and poor grades at low levels of stress, it was associated with more adaptive functioning on these outcomes at higher levels of stress.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nancy A. Gonzales
Arizona State University
Jenn‐Yun Tein
Arizona State University
Irwin N. Sandler
Arizona State University
Journal of Adolescent Research
Northwestern University
Arizona State University
Realistic Education in Action Coalition to Foster Health
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gonzales et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10f9dc2c0ee39daeee60c5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558401164005
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: