PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2001Journal of Adolescent Research243 citations

On the Limits of Coping

View Full Paper
NGNancy A. GonzalesArizona State UniversityJTJenn‐Yun TeinArizona State UniversityISIrwin N. SandlerArizona State University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This study examined the effects of four coping dimensions—active coping, avoidance, distraction, and support—on conduct problems, depression, and achievement in a multiethnic, inner-city sample of early adolescents. The main effects of coping were examined, along with stress X coping interactions. For girls, active coping interacted with family and community stress to predict conduct problems and grades, respectively, and with community stress to predict depression. These interactions revealed a classic stress-buffering effect for active coping. For boys, although active coping interacted with community and peer stress to predict depression and with community and family stress to predict grades, these findings did not support the stress-buffering effect. Although avoidant coping was positively associated with depression and poor grades at low levels of stress, it was associated with more adaptive functioning on these outcomes at higher levels of stress.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gonzales et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10f9dc2c0ee39daeee60c5https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558401164005
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper