Key result
Submental transcutaneous electrical stimulation lowers diastolic blood pressure in healthy awake subjects across various conditions.
Why the study?
Electrical stimulation has been introduced for obstructive sleep apnoea, but few data exist on the effects of transcutaneous submental electrical stimulation on the cardiovascular system.
Does transcutaneous submental electrical stimulation affect cardiorespiratory variables in healthy subjects?
Does transcutaneous submental electrical stimulation affect cardiorespiratory variables in healthy subjects?
p-value: p=3.48E-09
Transcutaneous submental electrical stimulation significantly decreases blood pressure in healthy subjects across different postures and gas conditions.
Background: Electrical stimulation has recently been introduced to treat patients with Obstructive sleep apnoea There are, however, few data on the effects of transcutaneous submental electrical stimulation (TES) on the cardiovascular system. We studied the effect of TES on cardiorespiratory variables in healthy volunteers during head-down-tilt (HDT) induced baroreceptor loading. Method: Cardiorespiratory parameters (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, tidal volume, airflow/minute ventilation, oxygen saturation, and end-tidal CO2/O2 concentration) were recorded seated, supine, and during head-down-tilt (50) under normoxic, hypercapnic (FiCO 2 5%) and poikilocapnic hypoxic (FiO 2 12%) conditions. Blood pressure (BP) was measured non-invasively and continuously (Finapres). Gas conditions were applied in random order. All participants were studied twice on different days, once without and once with TES. Results: We studied 13 healthy subjects (age 29 (12) years, six female, body mass index (BMI) 23.23 (1.6) kg·m −2 ). A three-way ANOVA indicated that BP decreased significantly with TES (systolic: p = 4.93E-06, diastolic: p = 3.48E-09, mean: p = 3.88E-08). Change in gas condition (systolic: p = 0.0402, diastolic: p = 0.0033, mean: p = 0.0034) and different postures (systolic: 8.49E-08, diastolic: p = 6.91E-04, mean: p = 5.47E-05) similarly impacted on BP control. When tested for interaction, there were no significant associations between the three different factors electrical stimulation, gas condition, or posture, except for an effect on minute ventilation (gas condition/posture p = 0.0369). Conclusion: Transcutaneous electrical stimulation has a substantial impact on the blood pressure. Similarly, postural changes and variations in inspired gas impact on blood pressure control. Finally, there was an interaction between posture and inspired gases that affects minute ventilation. These observations have implications on our understanding of integrated cardiorespiratory control, and may prove beneficial for patients with SDB who are assessed for treatment with electrical stimulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alsharifi et al. (2023) studied Healthy volunteers (n=13). Transcutaneous submental electrical stimulation (TES) vs. No electrical stimulation was evaluated on Change in diastolic blood pressure (p=3.48E-09). Transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the submental area significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure in healthy awake subjects across different postures and gas conditions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: